MyFox
 

superbrowns's Blog

by superbrowns from Deerfield

Last Post 15 days, 3 hours Ago


By STEVEN A. HOLMES Published: September 30, 1999

In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.

The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.

In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.

''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. ''Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.''

Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.

In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.

''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''

Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.

Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites.

Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the economic boom of the 1990's. The number of mortgages extended to Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according to Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by 46.3 per cent.

In contrast, the number of non-Hispanic whites who received loans for homes increased by 31.2 per cent.

Despite these gains, home ownership rates for minorities continue to lag behind non-Hispanic whites, in part because blacks and Hispanics in particular tend to have on average worse credit ratings.

In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.

The change in policy also comes at the same time that HUD is investigating allegations of racial discrimination in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants.

7 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 7
Page 1 of 1
superbrowns read my blog view my photos
Sep 26, 2008 | 5:27 PM

http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-3381382/Goal-or
iented-Fannie-Mae-and.html

superbrowns read my blog view my photos
Sep 26, 2008 | 5:36 PM

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-190

stylegal read my blog view my photos
Sep 26, 2008 | 10:28 PM

Two of the worst culpruts in the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac collapse:

Chris Dodd
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/17/mccains-attempt-t
o-fix-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-in-2005/

AND

Barney Frank
http://www.businessandmedia.org/printer/2008/2008092414
5932.aspx

superbrowns read my blog view my photos
Sep 28, 2008 | 5:27 AM

In 2001 to 2003 President Bush Told Congress that Fannie and freddie needed to be fixed yet nothing was done.
in 2003 Barney Franks stated that their was nothing wrong with them and that they should find a way to give more low income loans, and anyting on the issue was shot down.
Greenspan also made an attempt to get someting done he stated twice that the GSE needed to be reformed, in 2005 a bill was sponsored by Dole and had two co-sponsors and it never made it to the floor in 2006 McCain signed on and co-sponsored the bill and was trying to push it again but again it failed.
President Bush spoke out on freddie and Fannie several times through out his time in office yet Congress did nothing,
Republicans didn't want regulations and Democrats wanted to keep handing out low income loans and the lenders went with it and slaped high intrest rates on them.
The more I read on it the more I see this was set up to fail and it all started with HUD and fueled by policial correctness with people claiming that their race was stopping them from getting a loan and failing to see it was income.
In my opinion the blame falls on the people that cry out about being fair with giving out loans and failing to see that income and a down payment was really stoping them from getting a loan and pulling the race card was the only way they could get something done.

imsellenu200 read my blog
Sep 29, 2008 | 7:15 AM

Why not give every household in America 100000 to go towards there mortgages? 275 million is a farrrrrrr shout from 700 billion. For every household rich or poor an opportunity for new beginnings will hail victory to the economic depression. Banks will get paid… homeowners will actually be home owners and those whom owe more an there mortgages will have 100k less to pay back. If a home owner owes example 75k and has 25k in credit cards they can pay off outstanding debts. If we are getting the bill then we should get the rewards. If 150 million Americans lost their home for the last 5 years its 72 billion where is the 700 billion accounting for. Give to the people who pay taxes in America and all credit woes and housing will be better than ever. Simple math and a simple solution yet we will get shafted in the end

imsellenu200 read my blog
Sep 29, 2008 | 7:15 AM

Why not give every household in America 100000 to go towards there mortgages? 275 million is a farrrrrrr shout from 700 billion. For every household rich or poor an opportunity for new beginnings will hail victory to the economic depression. Banks will get paid… homeowners will actually be home owners and those whom owe more an there mortgages will have 100k less to pay back. If a home owner owes example 75k and has 25k in credit cards they can pay off outstanding debts. If we are getting the bill then we should get the rewards. If 150 million Americans lost their home for the last 5 years its 72 billion where is the 700 billion accounting for. Give to the people who pay taxes in America and all credit woes and housing will be better than ever. Simple math and a simple solution yet we will get shafted in the end

sofakingdabest read my blog view my photos
Sep 29, 2008 | 10:26 AM

It all started in the 1980's when credit cards became readily available and car ads were filled with "no credit no problem". Relaxing credit started a long time ago.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




superbrowns

I'm a Browns fan born and raised on the westside of Cleveland moved to Deerfield about 16 years ago. I used to work as an usher at the old stadium watching the Browns games and getting paid for it what a great job.PROUD REPUBLICAN, AND I WILL NOT STAND FOR ANYONE BASHING ANY AMERICAN PRESIDENT.

Member Since: 10/11/2006