MyFox
 

meanyman's Blog

by meanyman from Cleveland

Last Post 499 days, 16 hours Ago


It's been four years since the Dixie Chicks said they were ashamed President Bush is from Texas.

Four years, several threats, cancelled concerts, and a big comeback later, the Chicks won Five grammy awards including record of the year.

But there are still a lot of people who can't stand the Dixie Chicks and will never forgive them for what they said.

What's your take on the Dixie Chicks:

  Do you forgive them?

  Do you like them more?

  Do you still not like them?

 

 

19 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 19
Page 1 of 1
imrandy read my blog view my photos
Feb 12, 2007 | 9:04 AM

As has been said by a number of other people, there's nothing to forgive. Actually, those who have threatened the Dixie Chicks and caused their concerts to be cancelled should apologize for trying to take away their right to freedom of speech.

I liked the Dixie Chicks prior to this non-issue, but I like them even more after hearing their performance last night.

It's ironic how the country music industry, who is all gungho about America would turn their back on a group of women who voiced their opinions. These women were brave and have stood up for their convictions, unlike those who kept quiet because it was the easiest thing to do.

girlscout read my blog view my photos
Feb 12, 2007 | 9:50 AM

I agree - I am not a country music fan and don't really listen to their music. But they have a right to express their opinions as Americans. A LOT of Americans don't approve or like President Bush. That doesn't make them all un-American. Free speech is what this country is all about.

Newyawker read my blog
Feb 12, 2007 | 9:58 AM

"Free speech is what this country is all about". Correct, and that means that those who don't like what the Chicks said have a right to express that opinion too. Randy, the constitutional right to free speech is protection from government restricting your speech, not a right to be free from criticism (and boycotts or whatever) by other free citizens. So Randy I agree with you, the Chicks don't owe anyone an apology...nor does anyone owe them an apology.

imrandy read my blog view my photos
Feb 12, 2007 | 11:26 AM

People have the right to criticize the Chicks, but they don't have the right to incite panic by leveling threats against them. Therefore, there are those who indeed owe them and their fans an apology. The threats were an attempt to silence the Chicks right to criticize Bush.

ctowngal read my blog
Feb 12, 2007 | 12:10 PM

I personally love their music and admire them for sticking to their convictions. Last night folk singer Joan Baez, introduced the Chick's by expressing her admiration for the outspoken group as she referred to her own role in protesting the Vietnam war, saying many times she was asked to "shut up and sing." We need more people who are willing to take the heat for speaking their minds and not be fearful of the consequences--esp from an administration that has been known to try and keep people quiet. Just look at what happened to protestors in NY during the Republican Natl. Convention. Bottom line is that they are truly talented musicians, as proven by their most recent album and it's success, but they are also very strong women. If people try to boycott them, that is their choice, but death threats are unacceptable. Our country is so amazing because of the freedoms we have. Isn't that what we are supposedly fighting for in Iraq--democracy & freedoms? That is what this admin claims.

weazelusmc
Feb 12, 2007 | 4:54 PM

5 Grammys but they have had to cancel and "re-rout" concerts due to slow ticket sales, promoting their Grammy album.
The Dixie Chicks just don't muster up. This was a political statment from "the music biz", nothing more; nothing less. Too bad they don't pay to see your concert or buy your CD's, ladies...
Oh, let's not forget: Milli Vanilli received a Grammy as well.

shesson view my photos
Feb 12, 2007 | 8:07 PM

I agree with weazelusmc. Just another bit of media manipulation to make a point. The problem isn't what was said, it's how it was done. I'd bet they wouldn't have made then at a concert in their home state of Texas at that time. They were made in a different country to gain acceptance (and money in record sales) from those who lived there. It wasn't brave at all. It was a classic case of saying what those around you wanted to hear. They tried to spin it as freedom of speech to save face for being back stabbers.

imrandy read my blog view my photos
Feb 12, 2007 | 8:43 PM

It's simple, Bush is a horrible president, just look at his approval rating! The Chicks certainly were brave because they had to know it was going to come back to bite them to make an anti-war statement because the political climate was one of gungho warfare. They were some of the few to actually speak out against the war. Why do the conservatives always spin things into blaming the media when things don't go their way?! The Chicks point was that they were embarrassed to be from the same state as Bush--they certainly made that clear. To have made such a statement in Texas may have gotten them shot--you've heard about the threats. Spin it however you want to believe it.

Hannitized21 read my blog view my photos
Feb 12, 2007 | 11:49 PM

Bush is a horrible president because of his approval rating? How ignorant can you be? Obviously you are uninformed that great Presidents in U.S. history have had low approval ratings. Yeah, how "brave" of the Sticks and Pig for saying what they said OVERSEA'S!!! Conservatives are upset with the media because the majority of it is biased toward the left. If you refuse to pull your head out of the sand when it comes to this issue, you're obviously ignoring the Pew Research data that shows the media is liberal. So you can "spin it" however you want to.

imrandy read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2007 | 1:08 AM

How stubbornly ignorant are you?! His approval rating is an indication of how poorly voters feel he is performing. Get real!

President Clinton was the greatest president of my lifetime, and his approval rating wasn't very low. Yeah, Bush is doing a great job with our position in the world policy, the environment, the economy. Come on!

You are obviously willing to crash and burn with conservative politics. Fortunately, the rest of us having something to say about that! My head is held high, yours is buried somewhere up Bush's behind. Pew Research?! As in "Pew, you stink!"

It's no use wasting my time with someone so stuck on bad politics and someone who misses the point. Go push your politics, religion, lifestyle, etc. on someone else.

gamer173 read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2007 | 5:42 AM

They can win all the grammys, I still turn the station when they come on.

RCR340 read my blog
Feb 13, 2007 | 7:13 AM

Bottom line is...........the Dixie Chicks have the Right to Free Speech, Bush would enjoy taking that right away to if he could! Some criticized the Dixie Chicks and voided their concerts but most Americans covered their backs and knew what was right. If you asked 8 out of 10 Americans what the problem is with this country, the precise and correct answer is George W. Bush! FACT, in Sunday's paper, George Bush has been voted in the world as a leading dictator. I beleive that he should be sent to the gallows to and do us Americans a great justice.
PS......I won't use a hood to cover my face as they did in Saddam's hanging because many of us know that it was not Iraqi civilians under those hoods.

ctowngal read my blog
Feb 13, 2007 | 9:59 AM

Hannitized21, at this point the majority of the country FINALLY realizes what a horrific failure Bush and his administration have been. The media's opinion/spin/bias no longer matters because most people have finally "removed their blinders" and are seeing through the lies and manipulations. Have you been following the Libby CIA trial at all? Do you not see what a scapegoat Cheney and others in the admin. made of Libby? I'm always amazed at Bush's supporters. Some people choose to be blindly led and the rest of the country has to pay for their bad votes. The end of his term can't come soon enough. How much more damage will be done??

Hannitized21 read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2007 | 12:06 PM

You're calling me ignorant and telling me my head's in the sand when you just disreguard a reputable research institution because it doesn't back your twisted perception?

Bush's low approval rating is mainly caused by the situation in Iraq. If things were going better there, his approval rating would much higher. You can also credit the media, who has tarred and feathered him for his unpopularity.

A sign of your ignorance is siting the economy for things "wrong" with Bush's presidency. If you look at the numbers, the economy is good. But liberals like you know that if you keep hammering home untruths, it'll stick with people who don't pay attention.

And one more thing. I didn't mention religion or lifestyle once. You're an irresponsible and wreckless zealot. Period.

Hannitized21 read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2007 | 12:07 PM

And to address the other one..... have you been following the Libbey case? They have NOTHING on him. The Kool Aid must taste great. Drink up.

ctowngal read my blog
Feb 13, 2007 | 2:51 PM

hannitized21,
First off, you seem very angry. Just want to say that it's ok for people to have various opinions. No one is personally attacking you so I hope it didn't come across that way & people can have real discussions without name calling.

Anyways, Bush's low approval rating is due to his lack of planning in Iraq and lack of a real reason to go to Iraq in the first place. Many Americans are starting to see that thousands are dying and there is no real plan to leave Iraq. The media is simply reporting what is happening.

Also I was wondering, how is the economy good? In what areas? Just curious and I am not trying to be sarcastic here.

And yes, I have been following the Libby (spelled "L-I-B-B-E-Y) case and so far this is what has come from it — including eight hours of Libby's own audio-recorded testimony to a grand jury in 2004 — suggest that a White House known as disciplined was anything but that.

_a vice president fixated on finding ways to debunk a former diplomat's claims that Bush misled the U.S. people in going to war and his suggestion Cheney might have played a role in suppressing contrary intelligence.

_a presidential press secretary kept in the dark on Iraq policy.

_top White House officials meeting daily to discuss the diplomat, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, and sometimes even his CIA-officer wife Valerie Plame.

What was interesting to me was what appears to be the total involvement of the vice president.

ps--I don't drink purple Kool Aid? You??

Hannitized21 read my blog view my photos
Feb 13, 2007 | 3:07 PM

ctown, you are right. We can all have a civil discussion over issues. As far as me being angry, yes I am. I'm angry over the fact that the media and all other liberals trash the President and his supporters regardless of what the facts state. It's one thing to question authority and have a debate over the issues. But it's another thing to slander the President and everything he's done. I understand that Bush has made mistakes, mainly in Iraq. But to say he lied to get us in Iraq is a lie in iteself. All credible intelligence pointed to the fact that Saddam Hussein had WMD's. Everyone from Bill Clinton to John Kerry said so as well. From what we know now, that's not the case. But that doesn't change the fact that Hussein violated 17 U.N. resolutions that violated the original cease fire agreement to end the first Gulf War.

The economy is good when you look at record setting numbers in home ownership under Bush's Presidency and the 13 or so months in a row of job growth. That's impressive, especially after 9/11.

And no, I do not drink Kool Aid.

Rock27 read my blog
Feb 13, 2007 | 7:28 PM

Record number of home ownerships, and an even higher record of home foreclosures. People are losing their homes left and right. Why? Because jobs are leaving to overseas and the jobs that are being created are retail jobs at Wal-Mart pushing those imported products.

The economy is not in good shape as Bush would have you believe. Yes, unemployment is low, but look at median household income and it will tell you a different story. And do not go by the 2000 census when you get your median income. Many jobs have been lost since then, only to be replaced by lower paying jobs.

Bush has been a major disappointment as president. Will the next one be better? I doubt it, but time will tell.

Hannitized21 read my blog view my photos
Feb 14, 2007 | 2:23 PM

If you want to make the argument that all the jobs created under Bush are Wal-Mart type jobs, then I'll counter with the fact that manufacturing is phasing itself out. If you expect the President to bring jobs that pay $100,000 a year as if they fall off trees, then anyone would be a disappointment as president.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




meanyman

No, I don't drink coffee, even though I get up at 2:30AM every morning. Todd Meany here, if you didn't guess. I do love working in the mornings though. The crew is great, and it's nice to be home in the afternoon so I can hang out with my 3 boys.

Member Since: 9/6/2006