MyFox
 

goldenthroat's Blog

by goldenthroat from Akron

Last Post 19 days, 8 hours Ago


I see where the University of Illinois has forever banned any more appearances of their "indian" mascot -  where will it end? And if you REALLY want to take this ridiculous issue all the way, then let's ban ALL nicknames!

Case in point - I am of Irish lineage.  When my father was in high school in the 30s, his nickname was "Irish". Maybe I, along with anyone of an Irish background, should storm the gates of Akron St. Vincent/St. Mary High School or the University of Notre Dame in Indiana and protest the name "Fighting Irish". In Tuscarawas County, New Philadelphia High School bears the nickname "Quakers".  Some refer to them as the 'Fighting Quakers'. Now THERE is an oxymoron if there ever was one!  Yet I have neither read nor heard of any attempts to change these nicknames.  BTW - Their cross-county rival, Dover High School, bears the name "Tornadoes".  Hmmm - I wonder if any Fox8 meteorologists take offense to this one?

How about USC? Did it ever occur to anyone that the name "Trojans" may be offensive to those with their ancestry linked to Troy?  Virginia Tech's nickname is 'Hokies' - last time I checked, a 'hokie' was a bird modeled after a turkey and has been their mascot since 1961 ! 

I was raised that the definition of 'hokie'  described something said or done that was really stupid. What on earth does this pathetic creature look like? Maybe I shouldn't even ask!

Any and all schools that have animal nicknames might as well consider dropping them.  Bulldogs - Tigers - Cardinals - Golden Eagles - ad naseum - I can't believe PETA hasn't protested these names in that they might offend animal lovers!  

 

This issue has taken political correctness to new heights of absurdity!

I rest my case.

Your thoughts, please!  

 

3 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 3
Page 1 of 1
klh1886 read my blog view my photos
Feb 23, 2007 | 10:14 PM

yes I think that kind of thing is ridiculous to. Like getting rid of chief Wahoo. I honstly do not see what's the problem. Our baseball team certainly cannot be considered offensive can it? All this kind of stuff in my opinion is obsurd. When will it end? I guess the squeaky wheel gets the grease.

heavyw8t read my blog
Feb 24, 2007 | 11:46 AM

Welcome to 2007, where over sensitivity is the status quo and everybody needs "a cause".

I wonder how the clergy feels about the St Louis Cardinals and the San Diego Padres. The Audobon Society should do something about the Blue Jays, St Louis Cardinals and Baltimore Orioles. The textile workers union has never said anything but they must be seething about the Red Sox and White Sox.

The Indians logo became "offensive" like 90 years after it's origin. Talk about jumping on a bandwagon. To me the logo brings to mind the "never say die" spirit of the native Americans, a positive trait rather than a negative one.

I remember the day I was at a flea market in Findlay and some woman at a table selling native American merchandise jumped all over me because I was wearing a baseball cap with Wahoo on it. Funny thing was that she didn't have much to say when I handed her the 30 bucks for the stuff I bought from her table.

Everybody SHUT UP and stop being so sensitive. Aren't there more important things to worry about than a logo on a cap?

gabulldogmom read my blog view my photos
Feb 27, 2007 | 9:56 AM

I HATE BEING POLITICALLY CORRECT!!

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




goldenthroat

I am a writer, musician, sports public address announcer, avid fisherman and died-in-the-wool Cleveland Indians, Cavs and Browns fan.

Member Since: 2/19/2007