Mars83's Blog

there was an act in 1978 in spying on countries around us. today we are being spy'd by our own government.

"Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act "aka FISA started in 1978. it hasn't ended. thing is this was added onto to begin PAA. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surv
eillance_Act#Without_a_court_order "Under the Protect America Act (PAA) of 2007, communications that begin or end in a foreign country may be wiretapped by the US government without supervision by the FISA Court. The Act removes from the definition of "electronic surveillance" in FISA any surveillance directed at a person reasonably believed to be located outside the United States. As such, surveillance of these communications no longer requires a government application to, and order issuing from, the FISA Court." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surv
eillance_Act#Protect_America_Act_of_2007 probably thinking..."it ain't so bad" but read more into PAA... "Domestic wiretapping The bill allowed the monitoring of all electronic communications of people in the United States without a court's order or oversight, so long as it is not targeted at one particular person "reasonably believed to be" inside the country. [1] [8] [9]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protect_America_Act_of_20
07#Domestic_wiretapping so basically we are spying in other countries and ourselves. like i said we got 9 bill of rights as the 4th was erased.

I hear time to time that people want experience and Obama doesn't have it. Yet who did?

Clinton had an experience running a state. GWH Bush his experience was fighting in WW2. Reagan had no experince in politics. people elected him from actor to president. Reagan is consider to some a great president.

McCain a war vet and Obama a US congressman. McCain with a corrupted past of the Keating 5 and Obama with a paster having his behind towards the future.

the right wants to focus on the experence of a person yet there consider great president Reagan  had no experience in politics. So whats the difference?

Since TruthGuy feels to post a blog and threatening to delete anything to counter his whining and complainning this is my answers towards him:

ms clinton scares the hell out of me. not electing obama would prove the paster being right. mccain wants to bankrupt america.

as for Iraq...in history we the US under Reagan were allies with Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war. WE gave Iraqie's weapons and shuch to win the war.
the intel that was given was out of saddam's mouth of his bluff. it was a bluff to prevent us or Iran to attack him.

1. it was a distraction for the lost track of war on terror in shutting down Al-Qaeda.
2. johnson's roles is now switched with bush...
3. agreed.
4. the middle man is raising the prices.
5. SS was created by liberals. SS is broken because we are lying past the ages of 65 now. and you do remember last time money became private in ohio during the coin gate?
6. torturing is a terrortist game we want to show we are different than the terrorists.
7. who cares?
8. the gay marriage ban and wanting an amendant to define marriage...did you sleep through that year?
9. your not bush you wouldn't know.
10. many failed and lessons learned.
11. well look at bush and his connections to the bin laden's. oh thats right you don't want to look...

12. unlike truth i ain't going censore those who disagree. the left needs the right and the right needs the left so that this country is balanced.

currently we have spent more on Iraq than vietnam. Mission is complete in Iraq as we should go home.

When we elect someone into the position they are our voice on many issues today. We decide if they fit with the current issues. There names do not make that judgement of what they believe in. We already live in a country that is in hell so having a name that has to do with a country's former leader should not matter unless there issues are the issue to not elect anyone one for this country. that should matter not there name

I find it interesting to a point that the republicans howl when a left wing website thinks of a General. When all I hear from the right from so many places calling the democrats "surrender monkeys, terrorists, terrorist supporters, cowards, and etc". Yet does the does any party condemened it? No. Why should the democrats condemened Moveon.org when the republicans don't condemened what they continuely call the democrats?